Camo Field Test: Effectiveness Comparison

High contrast shadows, deep greens, and browns. Requires disruption of outline and absorption of light.

90s

Excellent blend. The dark blacks match tree shadows perfectly.

90s

Too bright. Stands out like a ghost against the dark foliage.

00s

Digital pattern with excellent disruption. Pixelated design breaks up the outline effectively.

FAILED

00s

The "Glow in the dark" effect. The gray has no natural counterpart here.

CURRENT

NOW

Good compromise. Lighter than Woodland, but the macro-patterns break the outline.

Select Deployment Environment